Doug's Cribs
PBS
Why is This Needed?

Personal Bibliography Software

Caveats
PCs vs. MACs
Producer Web Sites
Making the database available for searching
Bibliography
Other people maintaining such pages
Standards for Bibliographic References (Style Manuals)

So you want to maintain your reprint file index (or your thesis bibliography, or your personal library catalogue) on computer instead of 3X5 cards? While it is possible to use MS Access, AskSam, WATFILE, Filemaker, FoxPro, or dbase, none of these programs make it easy to do some of the things that can be done with the specifically designed bibliographic software. Some features that come to mind are:

Prices range from under US$100 to over $400 as well as some freeware/shareware. Increased prices don't always mean more functionality.

And remember to ask yourself why you're doing this and what sort of results you expect from this exercise.

Return to top

Caveats

Return to top

PCs vs. MACs

The majority of these applications are PC based, still some DOS around, some Windows (if you're running Windows XP there may be compatibility issues). Several of the packages are also MacIntosh based. In my searching, I don't recall seeing any that were solely Mac. Some companies that are listed as having DOS/Windows/Mac versions don't list all of them on their web pages and price lists; write to them and ask what's up.

Return to top

Web Sites

One source of relatively current information are the producer's web sites. Besides descriptions and prices some also have downloadable demo versions. Another option is to find if there is a newsgroup for the software you are interested in and join.
Chorus at UC their list of Known Bibliographical Software Packages.

Dana Jacobsen at ACM seems to have a collection, strongest on BibTeX and also has a set of links including A survey of bibliographic tools and commerial bibliographic tools. You could also go to ZDNet (the PC Magazine people) and search for bibliographic

Return to top

Making the Database Available for Searching

Having put a lot of work into the database you now want to share it with others. Your options range from:
printing off a listing
This is what most of these programs were designed to do. Indexes such as author and subject, can be generated, depending on how much you want to play with it. Not very sexy but fast and functional.
putting a listing on the web
Similar to printing on paper but as an HTML document. Not a lot of sophisticated searching can be done but it would be fine for shorter lists that don't change frequently.
getting a networked version of the software
Some of the programs have networkable search-only versions in which you maintain the database while others on your network can search but not modify. Usually distribution is only as far as the extent of the network, the query language is the same as in the full database program. You will likely need network programming skills or the assistance of your local network guru.
putting a searchable version on the web
You will be able to distribute the database to a wide audience, or to a select group. Some of the program producers are developing the capability within the program or as add-ons. Others are recommending third-party producers. You may need to locate the software on the same machine as is hosting the web-server software. Query and reporting languages will likely vary. You will likely need some web programming skills or the assistance of your local web weaver.

Return to top

Bibliography

Chiang KS, Curtis H, Stewart LG. Creating bibliographies for business use. PC Magazine November 12, 1985;:249-260.
Finder 1.00; Notebook II 1.03, Bibliography 2.01; Inmagic 6.03

Fernandes T, Raucy JL, Black M. REF-ED. Literature of Medicine nd;nv:321.

Gauvin, JF. Posting your references on the web. Database 1998;21(6): 41-47. WebPoster 1.1, Inmagic WebPublisher, WebSuite 1.0, AskSam's Web Publisher, Showbase Extra 2.1

Grosch A. Library Master: bibliographic and textual database software. The Electronic Library December 1990;8(6):430-433.
[similar in Online Review 1990 Oct; 14(6): 409-414.]

Library Master (early)

Kebbekus B. Papyrus. Version 6.0. J Am Chem Soc 1990;112(10):4091-4092.
Papyrus 6.0

Lundeen G. Bibliographic software update. Database December 1991;14(6):57-67.
AskSAM 5.0; Notebook II 4.0; Reference Manager 5.02 dms4cite 5.30; Library Master 1.23; Papyrus 6.1.

Lundeen G. Datafax 4.0: simple text storage and retrieval. The Electronic Library October 1990;8(5):363-364.
Datafax 4.0

Lundeen G. Software for managing personal files. Database June 1989;12(3):36- 48.
bibliog; AskSAM 4.0; Notebook II 3.0; Reference Manager 4.0; Pro-Cite 1.4.

Matthews, Judy. Reference managers. Nature July 29, 1999 Olson, Rebeccca. Reference managers. MacUser January 1997; 13(1) :48 Poor A. Twixt dBASE and DTP. PC Magazine May 12, 1992;11(10):271-297.

Puglia V. TBMS database power unleashed. PC Magazine November 25, 1986;5(20): 211-230.
Inmagic ; AskSAM; Executive FIler; Instant Recall; Square Note; Sequiter; Notebook II; Daflo; Mist +; Marcon Plus.

Rabinowitz R. Point of reference. Bibliographic software. PC Magazine October 12, 1993;12(17):269-283?

Raeder A. Library Master for databases and bibliographies. Database October 1991;14(5):67-72.
Library Master 1.2

Sieverts EG, Figdor J, Bakker S, Hofstede M. Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared. Part 3 - End-user software. The Electronic Library February 1992;10(1):5-19.

Sieverts EG, Hofstede M, Haak Ph.H., Nieuwenhuysen P., Scheepsma G.A.M., Veeger L, Vis GC. Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared. Part 2 - classical retrieval systems. The Electronic Library December 1991;9(6):301-318.

Sieverts EG, Hofstede M, Lobbestael G, Oude Groeniger B, Provost F, Sikova P. Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared. Part 5 - personal information managers, hypertext and relevance ranking programs. Electronic Library December 1992;10(6): 339-357.

Sieverts EG, Hofstede M, Oude Groeniger B. Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared. Part 4 - Indexing and full-text retrieval programs. The Electronic Library August 1992; 10(4):195-208.

Sieverts EG, Hofstede M. Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared. Part 1 - general introduction. The Electronic Library June 1991;9(3):145-154.

Stigleman S. Bibliography formatting software: a buying guide. Database February 1992;15(1):15-27.
41 programs compared with charts incl. Pro-Cite; Library Master; Notebook II; Papyrus; ...

Stigleman S. Bibliography formatting software: an update. Database February 1993;16(1):24-37.

Stigleman S. Bibliography formatting software: an updated buying guide. Database December 1994;17(6):53-65.

Tenopir C. Software options for in-house bibliographic databases. Library Journal May 15, 1987;:54-55.
General plus list

Wolff TE. Library Master. Version 1.24. J Am Chem Soc 1992;114(2):796-797.
Library Master 1.24

Wolff TE. Personal bibliographic databases: an industrial scientist's perspective. Database April 1992;15(2):34-40.
bibliog; Library Master 1.24; Notebook II 4.05; Papyrus 6.0.6; Pro-Cite 1.41;( nbCitation; KEDIT 4.00)

Bibliographic Software and the Electronic Library, edited by Terry Hanson, University of Hertfordshire Press, 1995. ISBN: 0-900458-51-8.

Return to top


Other people maintaining such pages

Return to top

Standards for Bibliographic References (Style Manuals)


Return to top

Other stuff dumped in - so far unsorted

Sometimes there will be a pile of unsorted stuff here sometimes not.

Since I've build an application that is a personal bibliographic references management program for PDA, I would like to know your opinion about it, in case you have a PDA based on ARM chip and with PocketPC operating system. The name of the application is PocketKnowledge, and you can found it in www.download.com.


Return to top
Return to Doug's Cribs Table of Contents
Return to Main page


Douglas Morton

Last Modified
Dec. 3, 2006