Task Group on Library Collections Space
Final Report
June 11, 1992
Solutions Considered by the Task Group
6. Microform Conversion of Periodicals
Assumptions
- Consider current titles only (approx. 6,000 titles)
- Average number of years per title is 20
- Average number of bound periodicals per title is 2 vols./year
- Replace all volumes available in microfilm by microfilm
- Discard or sell paper copy volumes replaced by microfilm
- 1 single face section will hold 100 periodical volumes or 125 books
- Spacesaver cabinets will be used to house microfilm.
Know
- Based on sample, approximately half of the current titles are available in microform (approx. 3,000 titles)
- Based on sample average price per reel is $30
- Spacesaver units cost $3,000 each
- Spacesaver units hold 1,360 reels of microfilm
Evaluation Criteria
Gain in Shelf Space
- Gain will equal the space freed up by removing 120,000
volumes of bound periodicals (3,000 titles x 20 years/title x 2
vols./year) less the space required to house 60,000 reels of
microfilm or 44 cabinets. The periodical volumes occupy 12,000
sq. ft. (0.1 vols./sq. ft.) while the microfilm will occupy 352
square feet. This represents a gain of shelf space for 120,000
volumes of periodicals or 150,000 books with a corresponding loss
of 352 square feet for microfilm.
Start-up Financial Costs
- Cost of spacesaver cabinets 44 x $3,000 = 132,000.
- Cost of microfilm 3,000 titles x 20 vol./title x $30/vol. =
$1,800,000. Total cost of converting 3,000 titles to microfilm is
approximately $1,932,000 excluding any additional cost for
microfilm readers and reader/printers.
Continuing Financial Costs
- Continuing costs are 3 x $3,000 or $9,000 annually for
spacesaver cabinets and 3,000 titles x 1 vol./title x $30/vol. =
$90,000 for microfilm. Total annual cost would be $99,000
excluding microfilm readers and reader printers.
Effects on Staff Morale
- There would be little effect on staff morale. Binding costs
would be reduced for the 3,000 titles being acquired in microfilm
by approximately one third of our binding budget or approximately
$30,000. User assistance in the use of readers and
reader/printers and print charging procedures would require
greater staff participation than at present.
Effects on the Accessibility of the Collection
- The collection would be no less accessible. Backfiles would
likely be used in the library as few users have access to
personal or departmental microform readers or
reader/printers.
Potential Resistance
- Microform is considerably less convenient to use than hard
copy. Based on previous experience faculty members and graduate
students would resist strenuously a massive conversion to
microform although the microform collection is more likely to be
on shelf. User resistance would be lessened somewhat if print
charges were equivalent to photocopy charges.

Assumptions
- Ceased and cancelled titles only (approx. 16,200 titles)
- Average number of bound periodicals per title is 2 vols./yr
- Replace all volumes available in microfilm by microfilm
- Discard or sell hard copy volumes replaced by microfilm
- 1 single face section will hold 100 periodical volumes or 125 books
- Spacesaver cabinets will be used to house microfilm
Know
- Based on sample, approximately 25% of the titles are available in microfilm (approx. 4,050 titles)
- Based on sample, average price per reel is $34
- Based on sample, average number of years per title is 5
- Spacesaver units cost $3,000 each
- Spacesaver units hold 1,360 reels of microfilm
EVALUATION OF CRITERIA
Gain in Shelf Space
Gain will equal space freed up by removing volumes of bound periodicals less the space required to house 20,250 reels of microfilm or 15 cabinets. The conversion frees up shelf space for volumes of periodicals or 40,500 books. Spacesaver cabinets will occupy 120 square feet.
Start-up financial costs
- Cost of Spacesaver cabinets 15 x $3,000 = 45,000
- Cost of microfilm, 4,050 titles x 5 vol./title x $34/vol. or
$688,500. Total cost is $733,500 excluding costs for microfilm
readers and reader/printers.
Continuing financial costs
Effects on Staff morale
- There would be little effect on morale. There would be NO
subsequent decrease in the binding budget as titles are not
continuing.
- As above, user assistance in use of readers etc. and print
charging procedures would require greater staff participation
than at present.
Effects on the Accessibility of the Collection
Potential Resistance
- User assistance would be somewhat less than in 6(a)(i) above
since most recorded collection use is for current continuing
titles. Otherwise resistance would be similar to that noted
above.
David Emery
Associate Librarian, Collections
WWW version: June 5, 1995
Secretary to the University Librarian
Last Updated: February 27, 2007