Skip to the content of the web site.

Community Needs Assessment Committee

How did we do today Survey
Summary of Results

November 3rd to November 28, 2003

Purpose

The purpose of the How did we do today survey was to evaluate the quality of service provided at the UMD library. Specifically, the UMD Library staff were interested in studying four elements of service:

It was anticipated that the results of the survey would reveal if there are any service areas that need improvement.

Methodology

The survey was left out at the Public Service desk, at the UMD Library (ES1, Room 246), and posters were displayed throughout the library informing users of the survey. The survey was printed on 8.5x11 sheet of paper, and was double-sided. A box with an open slit on the front was made available to deposit the survey in. The survey ran for four weeks, and it was anticipated that roughly 30 surveys would be answered, however only 9 were submitted.

Findings

The survey participants consisted of nine individuals - six UW undergraduate students and three UW graduate students.

  1. 8 out of 9 participants indicated that they had found what they were looking for
  2. Everybody who used the webpages considered them to be a useful tool for finding information and easy to navigate through. One person however, was not aware that the pages existed.
  3. One individual commented on the geospatial data and service - “Although data is licensed and copy writed, there should be a way for students to work on it without having to wait for librarian assistance…would save both parties time. Everything else here is copywrited as well!” and that the service received was “good, but had to wait even though time booked, because librarian was busy”.
  4. Overall, the quality of service provided at the UMD library was considered to be ‘excellent’. 8 out of 9 participants indicated that they had received excellent service, and one individual thought it was ‘good’. Two individuals commented that the staff are “very friendly and helpful”. One person did comment however that the library could be more user friendly – “easier to find books by topic”.

Evaluation

In conclusion, this survey revealed:

CNAC Home
Email Us
July 28, 2005